I noticed several hundred (at least) incoming Google searches on various combination of "Connecticut exit poll Lieberman Lamont," so let me pass on the official word regarding today’s Connecticut primary from ABC’s The Note: "There are no pooled network exit polls" [emphasis added].**
The Note also passes along this helpful information for those who plan to follow the returns:
The Connecticut Legislation and Elections website (LINK and LINK)
will be updated continually, as soon as information comes in. The state
is using a brand new system, which may or may not work. Should the
system not work, officials are prepared with a spreadsheet and the site
should be updated at roughly fifteen minute intervals with results.
Lever machines will dominate in today’s primary, with a smattering of optical scan voting places. And here is a chart, courtesy of the excellent folks at the AP,
detailing the timing of the reporting of results on election night in
2004 to use as a guide for tonight.First Reports from Counties: 8:35 pm ET
20% of Precincts Statewide by: 10:00 pm ET
90% of Precincts Statewide by: 1:01 am ET (Wednesday)
100% of Precincts Statewide by: 9:44 am ET (Wednesday)
Clarification: No "pooled" exit polls means no exit polls sponsored by the major networks, i.e. the National Election Pool (NEP) consortium. If anyone else conducts true exit polling in Connecticut, it’s news to me.
Some organizations (such as the Associated Press and Zogby) have conducted telephone surveys on Election Day in recent elections some places, and Zogby has taken to labeling his approach an "exit poll." I have no idea if any such efforts are underway in Connecticut today. I would have little faith in the ability of such a poll to project the outcome on Election Day, especially the Zogby model which apparently took three days to complete.
UPDATE (8:32 p.m.): Very alert reader Melanie reports in a comment below that she "filled out an exit poll for CBS news." Via email she adds:
It was an electronic device – the logo at the top said CBS News, with no
reference to our local CBS affiliate in Hartford. (It surprised me, which is
why I remember it.) There were a lot of questions – it took from 5-10 minutes.
She adds that most of the questions concerned the Lieberman-Lamont race, but for some reason "didn’t ask about the race for the gubernatorial nomination." Further:
I just heard a reporter note on NECN (New England Cable News- not affiliated
with any of the majors, I don’t think) that NY Times/CBS are doing exit
polling – I don’t know if it’s true, but that was what he said.
Obviously, the polls in Connecticut have now closed, so any results from this exit poll are likely to come directly from CBS News or the New York Times. ..
UPDATE II (8:48): Kathy Frankovic at CBS News confirms that they did in fact conduct an exit poll in Connecticut today in partnership with the Times, but will not be using it to project a winner in the Senate race. Stay tuned…
UPDATE III (9:30 a.m. 8/9): CBS has posted a brief report on their exit poll online.
ok, no POOLED exit polls, but does that mean that no one is doing non-pooled exit polls?
ZC:
No “pooled” exit polls means no exit polls sponsored by the major networks, i.e. the National Election Pool (NEP) consortium. See the update above
Why do we need “major networks” to conduct an exit poll? They haven’t done a good job of keeping their finger on the national pulse up to now. Local bloggers, get out there and do it!–Neil Elliott
I filled out an exit poll for CBS news – so at least one organization is conducting some polls.
I read somewhere that the absentee ballots from military and, I guess, other overseas CT voters may be counted up through August 25. Is that not so, and might there be substantial numbers of these?
The MSM didn’t think this was important enough for exit polls??!! Now doesn’t that just about sum up the state of journalism in America today…
If they had exit polls it would be harder for neo-cons to fix the election for Joe!
New York Times at 8:37:
Joseph I. Lieberman 7,199 43.4%
Ned Lamont 9,399 56.6%
6% reporting
New York Times at 9:00:
Joseph I. Lieberman 23,414 (43.7%)
Ned Lamont: 30,219 (56.3%)
Yahoo!
New York Times at 9:00:
Joseph I. Lieberman 23,414 (43.7%)
Ned Lamont: 30,219 (56.3%)
Yahoo!
Notice the trend (I’m a little worried that the margin is changing…):
New York Times at 9:13:
Joseph I. Lieberman 53,159 (46.4%)
Ned Lamont: 61,449 (53.6%)
38% reporting
I think it’s expected that as the cities report in, Ned’s lead will shrink. It’s all about who’s reporting in, baby!
The margin is tightening up!
Joseph I. Lieberman 64,700 (47.9%)
Ned Lamont 70,444 (52.1%)
50% of Precincts Reporting
Yikes!
09:44PM
484 of 748 Precincts Reporting (64.71%)
Lamont, Ned Dem 89,814 (51.60%)
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 84,231 (48.40%)
From http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2006/by_state/CT_Page_0808.html?SITE=CTHARELN&SECTION=POLITICS
The margin appears to stablizing at 3.2 (I hope)
9:49 pm: 537 of 748 Precincts Reporting – 71.79%
Lamont, Ned Dem 100,425 (51.61%)
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 94,148 (48.39%)
Looks a bit better. 3.52 margin
10:00 pm: 575 of 748 Precincts Reporting – 76.87%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 109,239 51.76
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 101,818 48.24
3.64 margin!
10:35 pm: 648 of 748 Precincts Reporting – 86.63%
Lamont, Ned Dem 124,528 (51.82%)
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 115,803 (48.18%)
Margin back down to 3.2, but with almost 90% reporting, I am feeling more secure!
10:45: 667 of 748 Precincts Reporting – 89.17%
Lamont, Ned Dem 127,786 (51.60%)
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 119,867 (48.40%)
Thanks for the updates Prantha. For what it’s worth, the last update I’ve seen has Lamont ahead by 3.45% with 94% of the precints in. My spreadsheet says Lieberman would need nearly 80% of what’s left to prevail. That’s not going to happen.
I would say that Lamont has won:
3.84 margin, with 93% reporting:
11:00 p.m. 713 of 748 Precincts Reporting – 95.32%
Lamont, Ned Dem 138,836 (51.92%)
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 128,566 (48.08%)
Yahoo!
LIEBERMAN CONCEDES!
Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman conceded the Democratic primary to challenger Ned Lamont shortly after 11 this evening, but vowed to continue his campaign as a petitioning candidate. .
11:10 pm: 724 of 748 Precincts Reporting – 96.79%
Lamont, Ned Dem 141,623 (51.85%)
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 131,491 (48.15%)
Lamont defeats Lieberman in Connecticut Race: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/08/nyregion/08cnd-campaign.html?hp&ex=1155096000&en=6e7fe1fab055b2ed&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Now, Lamont is checked as the wiinner with a 3.62 margin!
It’s over, and I hope the party takes this as a statement!
11:15: 733 of 748 Precincts Reporting – 97.99%
Lamont, Ned Dem 143,363 (51.81%)
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 133,323 (48.19%)
dfg34hdb
giochi ottico devinn lane alloggio modena
dfg34hdb
bluvacanze kraehe aufziehen weit gespreizt bein lag ich